Scholastic Achievement and Demographic Characteristics of Home School Students in 1998 

by Lawrence M. Rudner

 

 

By current estimates, there are between 700,000 and 1,200,000 students enrolled in home schools in the United States. Further, by all accounts, the movement has been growing steadily over the past few years (Lines, 1998). Yet, there is very little scientific literature concerning the population of home school students or even large samples of home school students.

This study describes the academic achievement levels and some basic demographic characteristics of a large sample of students and their families. While the academic levels of home school students are described in terms of public and private school norms, this study is not a comparison of home schools with public or private schools. Such comparisons would be fraught with problems. Home schooling is typically one-on-one. Public schools typically have classes with 25 to 30 students and an extremely wide range of abilities and backgrounds. Home school parents are, by definition, heavily involved in their children's education; the same, unfortunately, is not true of all public or private school parents. Home schools can easily pace and adapt their curriculum; public and private schools typically have a mandated scope and sequence. The list of differences could continue.

This study seeks to answer a much more modest set of questions: Does home schooling tend to work for those who chose to make such a commitment? That is, are the achievement levels of home school students comparable to those of public school students? Who is engaged in home schooling? That is, how does the home school population differ from the general United States population?

Methods

Bob Jones University Press Testing and Evaluation Service provides assessment services to home school students and private schools on a fee-for-service basis. In Spring 1998, 39,607 home school students were contracted to take the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS; grades K-8) or the Tests of Achievement and Proficiency (TAP; grades 9-12). Students were given an achievement test and their parents were asked to complete a questionnaire entitled "Voluntary Home School Demographic Survey." A total of 20,760 students in 11,930 families provided useable questionnaires with corresponding achievement tests. The achievement test and questionnaire results were combined to form the dataset used in this analysis.

This section provides descriptions of the achievement measures, the questionnaires, the Bob Jones University Press Testing and Evaluation Service, and the procedures used to develop the dataset.

Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS)

Home schooled students in Grades K-8 took the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) Form L, published by Riverside Publishing Company, a subsidiary of Houghton Mifflin. Developed by University of Iowa professors, the tests were designed and developed to measure skills and standards important to growth across the curriculum in the nation's public and private schools.

The ITBS reflects more than 50 years of test development experience and research on measuring achievement and critical thinking skills in Reading, Language Arts, Mathematics, Social Studies, Science, and Information Sources. The scope and sequence of the content measured by the ITBS were developed after careful review of national and state curricula and standards, current textbook series and instructional materials, and research (Riverside, 1993).

All items were tried out and tested for ethnic, cultural, and gender bias and fairness prior to the development of the final form of the tests. Data on a nationally representative sample of public and private schools were collected in 1992 and used to form the initial national norms. The norms were updated in 1995 by Riverside. This study used these 1995 spring norms.

Tests of Achievement and Proficiency (TAP)

Home schooled students in Grades 9-12 took the Tests of Achievement and Proficiency (TAP), Form L, also published by Riverside Publishing Company. The TAP was designed and developed to measure skills and standards important to growth across the high school curriculum. Like the ITBS, the TAP scope and sequence were developed after careful review of national and state curricula and standards, and current textbook series and instructional materials. Developed as an upward extension of the ITBS, the specifications, format, and design of the TAP tests are similar to that of the ITBS. TAP is fully articulated with the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) Form L (Riverside, 1993).

Background Questionnaires

Background questionnaires were designed by the staff of the Home School Legal Defense Association (HSLDA). Questions were determined by reviewing the questions in previous surveys, prioritizing them, and selecting only those that were most germane to the objectives of the study. Where possible, questions and responses were made to match those used by the U.S. Census, U.S. Department of Labor and the National Assessment of Educational Progress to facilitate comparisons of home school students with students nationwide.

HSLDA designed the survey to be much shorter than previous survey instruments. They also sought to pose all questions in an objective format, rather than a constructed response format. In keeping with this approach, HSLDA worked with National Computer Systems to design forms to be computer scanable, thereby removing the need for manual data processing.

Bob Jones University Press Testing and Evaluation Service

The Bob Jones University (BJU) Press Testing and Evaluation Service is the largest and oldest of four organizations providing home school families access to standardized achievement tests. The Testing Service began offering the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills and Tests of Achievement and Proficiency in 1984. In subsequent years they added other helpful tools including practice materials, a personality inventory, and diagnostic tests. In 1993, the Stanford Achievement Test series was added as BJU Press assumed the testing that the Home School Legal Defense Association had been providing for its members. Since that time, a full range of writing evaluations (grades 3-12) and a career assessment have been added to the growing number of evaluation tools offered by the Testing Service.

Just as home school families were the impetus behind the start of the Testing Service, home school families continue to be the largest sector utilizing the service. However, there are also a number of private schools that have chosen to use the services provided. Testing is provided for students throughout the United States and Canada, as well as many foreign countries.

The BJU Press Testing and Evaluation Service sends testing materials to qualified testers who administer the tests and return them to the Testing Service for scoring. The results are then returned to the parent. Many parents test primarily for their own information to verify that their home schooled students are progressing academically at a normal pace. Other parents use the results to meet a state testing requirement or to provide documentation when they choose to return their students to a public or private school setting.

Data Generation Procedures

The following steps were followed to produce the data set:

Parents contracted with Bob Jones University to be administered the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills or the Tests of Achievement Proficiency (39,607 students in probably 22,000 families).

Bob Jones certified test administrators, many of whom were the students' parents.

BJU sent questionnaires and answer forms to the test administrators.

Tests and questionnaires were returned to BJU. BJU bundled the tests and sent them to Riverside Publishers for machine scoring. BJU bundled the questionnaires and sent them to National Computer Systems for scanning. Unlike in previous studies, the parents did not know their scores ahead of time.

Electronic copy of the 23,415 test results and 23,311 questionnaire results were sent to the author of this report. These sets were merged to provide 20,900 cases with matching identification numbers. In order to weight by state public school enrollment, 140 cases with missing state data were dropped. A total of 20,760 students formed the initial dataset used in the study. After we formed the dataset with 20,760 students, we asked for the remainder of the 39,607 achievement test scores. We were informed that it would not be possible to disaggregate the remaining home school students from students in private schools also contracting testing services.

Characteristics of Home School Students and Families

This section provides a description of home school students and their families based on the 20,790 respondents to our questionnaire. The distribution of students by state, gender, age, race, parent marital status, family size, mother's religion, parent education, family income, television viewing, money spent on educational materials, and other demographic characteristics are identified and, where possible, compared to national figures.

State

As shown in Table 2.1, respondents came from each of the fifty states. Several states, including Ohio, Georgia, and Virginia, have exceptionally high representation given their size. This is probably due to the fact that these states require testing of home school students. To reduce the effects of these and other over-represented states, the data were weighted in all subsequent analyses by the number of public school students in each state. While we would have preferred to weight by the number of home schooled students in each state, such data are not available for all 50 states (Lines, 1998).

Table 2.1
Participating Home School Students
Classified by State

State Frequency % of sample   State Frequency % of sample
AK 65 0.3   MT 112 0.5
AL 181 0.9   NC 972 4.7
AR 42 0.2   ND 100 0.5
AZ 201 1.0   NE 126 0.6
CA 815 3.9   NH 176 0.8
CO 810 3.9   NJ 324 1.6
CT 54 0.3   NM 189 0.9
DC 17 0.1   NV 53 0.3
DE 28 0.1   NY 942 4.5
FL 860 4.1   OH 2484 11.9
GA 1547 7.4   OK 382 1.8
GU 10 0.0   OR 67 0.3
HI 112 0.5   PA 532 2.6
IA 234 1.1   PR 8 0.0
ID 28 0.1   RI 32 0.2
IL 451 2.2   SC 579 2.8
IN 533 2.6   SD 27 0.1
KS 319 1.5   TX 1126 1.5
KY 163 0.8   UT 35 0.2
LA 551 2.7   VA 1608 7.7
MA 343 1.6   VI 2 0.0
MD 196 0.9   VT 59 0.3
ME 109 0.5   WA 787 3.8
MI 523 2.5   WI 246 1.2
MN 794 3.8   WV 92 0.4
MO 361 1.7   WY 40 0.2
MS 25 0.1  


Student Age and Gender

Table 2.2 shows the distribution of the respondents by gender and age. About 50.4% or 10,471 of the respondents were females; 49.6% (10,319) were males. These figures are comparable to that of the population of 3 to 34 years old enrolled in school (see U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1998, Table A-2). Some 51.4% of school enrollees nationally are male. The percentages are comparable at all age levels.

Table 2.2
Participating Home School Students  
Classified by Gender and Age

Age at time of testing (in years)
6 7 8 9

10

11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Females 507 879 1148 1318 1301 1248 1049 936 774 516 264 119
56.1% 51.7% 50.2% 49.2% 52.4% 50.6% 47.2% 50.5% 50.7% 51.0% 49.3% 57.5%

Males

397 820 1141 1360 1181 1216 1174 918 754 495 271 88
43.9% 48.3% 49.8% 50.8% 47.6% 49.4% 52.8% 49.5% 49.3% 49.0% 50.7% 42.5%
Total 904 1699 2289 2678 2482 2464 2223 1854 1528 1011 535 207


Student Grade

Home school student grade placement was identified by their parents, presumably based on the grade level of the instructional materials. That grade was used by BJU to determine the test levels and used in this report as a grouping variable. Table 2.3 shows the distribution of respondents and the nation by grade. There is a large difference in the proportions of high school (grades 9-12) home school students and the nation. Compared to the national data, a relatively small percentage of home school students are enrolled in high school. Possible reasons for this lower participation for high school students may be the relative newness of the home school movement, early graduation from high school, and possibly a desire on the part of some home school parents to enroll their children in a traditional high school. The distributional differences for students in grades 1 through 8 are minor.

Table 2.3
Home School Students Classified by Grade with Percents
and National School Percents

Grade

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

Home
School

7.4%

10.6%

14.1%

12.9%

12.6%

11.9%

10.3%

8.8%

5.7%

3.8%

1.6%

0.3%

(1504)

(2153)

(2876)

(2625)

(2564)

(2420)

(2087)

(1801)

(1164)

(775)

(317)

(66)

Nation

9.1%

8.8%

8.9%

8.7%

8.6%

8.7%

8.7%

8.4%

9.0%

7.9%

7.1%

6.3%

National data: US Census, 1997b, Table 254

Student Race

Table 2.4 shows the racial distribution of home school students in 1998 and for the students enrolled in elementary and secondary public and private schools nationally in 1994. The distributions are quite different. The vast majority of home schooled children are non-Hispanic White. The largest minority groups for home school students (not shown in the table) are American Indians and Asian students who comprise some 2.4% and 1.2% of the home school students, respectively.

Table 2.4
Racial Distribution of Home School Students
And the Nation, in Percents

Students White
 (not Hispanic) 
Black
 (not Hispanic) 
 Hispanic   Other 
 Home School  94.0% 0.8% 0.2% 5.0%
Nationwide 67.2% 16.0% 13.0% 3.8%

National data: USDE, 1996; Indicator 27

 

Marital Status

The great majority of home school students are in married couple families. In contrast, only 72% of the families with at least one child enrolled in school nationwide are in married couple families (Bruno and Curry, 1997, Table 19).

Table 2.5
Home School Students
Classified by Parents' Marital Status

Marital Status  Frequency   Percent 
Divorced      80 0.7%
 Single (never married)       44 0.4%
Married 11,335 97.2%
Separated     131 1.1%
Widowed      55 0.5%
Missing data      16 0.1%

Total: 

11,661

100.0%

 

Children at Home

Table 2.6 shows the distribution of children in home school families and families with children under 18 nationwide. On average, home school students are in larger families. Nationwide, most families with school-age children (79.6%) have only 1 or 2 children with a mean of about 1.9 children per family. Most home school families (62.1%) have 3 or more children with a mean of about 3.1 children per family.

Table 2.6
Home School Families
Classified by Family Size with National Comparison

 Home School Families   Nationwide 
 Number of 
Children
 Percent   Number of 
Children
 Percent 
1 8.3% 1 40.8%
2 29.6% 2 38.8%
3 28.6% 3 14.3%
4 18.6% 4 or more 6.1%
5 8.4%    
3.9%    
7 or more 2.6%    

National Data: US Census, 1997a, Table 77

 

Mother's Religion

We asked the home school families to identify the religious preference of each student's mother by selecting from a list of 27 religions. As shown in Table 2.7, the largest percentage of mothers identified themselves as Independent Fundamental, Baptist, Independent Charismatic, Roman Catholic, Assembly of God, or Presbyterian. The religious preference of the father was the same as that of the mother 93.1% of the time.

Table 2.7
Home School Students
Classified by Mother's Religion

Mother's religion  Frequency   Percent 
 Independent Fundamental   5,119 25.1%
Baptist  5,072 24.4%
Independent Charismatic  1,681 8.2%
Roman Catholic  1,106 5.4%
Assembly of God    838 4.1%
Presbyterian    772 3.8%
Reformed    685 3.4%
Other Protestant    500 2.5%
Pentecostal    459 2.2%
Methodist    420 2.1%
Lutheran    353 1.7%
Other Christian  2,213 10.9%
Other  1,572 6.2%

Total: 

20,790 100.0%

 

Parent Academic Attainment

As shown in Table 2.8, home school parents have more formal education than the general population. While slightly less than half of the general population attended or graduated from college, almost 88% of home school students have parents who continued their education after high school.

Table 2.8
Distribution of Home School Students and Students Nationally
Classified by Parent Academic Attainment

 
 Did not 
finish
high
school
High
school
 graduate 
Some
 college, 
no
degree
 Associate 
degree
 Bachelors 
degree
 Masters 
degree
 Doctorate 
Home
school
fathers
1.2% 9.3% 16.4% 6.9% 37.6% 19.8% 8.8%
Nation
males 
18.1% 32.0% 19.5% 6.4% 15.6% 5.4% 3.1%
Home
school
mothers
0.5% 11.3% 21.8% 9.7% 47.2% 8.8% 0.7%
Nation
 females 
17.2% 34.2% 20.2% 7.7% 14.8% 4.5% 1.3%

National data: U.S. Census (1996; Table 8)

Family Income

National data on family income are available for 1995. As shown in Table 2.9, home school families span all income levels. On average, home school families have a higher income level than do families with children nationwide and all families nationwide. The median family income level for home school families in 1997 is about $52,000. The median income for families with children in 1995, nationwide, was about $36,000.

Table 2.9
Distribution of Family Income for Home School Families,
Families with Children Nationwide, and All Families Nationwide
by Income Levels, in Percents

Income  Home school  Families
 with children 
 All Families 
 Less than 
$10,000
0.8% 12.6% 10.5%
$10,000
 to $14,999 
1.5% 8.0% 8.5%
$15,000
to $19,999
2.2% 6.1% 6.8%
$20,000
to $24,999
3.9% 7.6% 8.4%
$25,000
to $29,999
4.9% 7.5% 7.8%
$30,000
to $34,999
8.5% 7.5% 7.6%
$35,000
to $39,999
8.1% 7.1% 7.0%
$40,000
to $49,999
16.0% 11.3% 11.0%
$50,000
to $74,999
32.5% 18.4% 18.1%
$75,000
and over
21.6% 13.8% 14.3%

National data: Bruno and Curry (1997, Table 19) 

 

Television Viewing

The National Assessment of Educational Progress collects information on the television viewing habits of fourth-graders. Home school fourth-graders and fourth-graders nationally differ markedly in terms of television viewing. Home school students rarely watch more than 3 hours of television per day; nearly 40% of the students nationwide watch that much television.

Table 2.10
Fourth-grade Students
Classified by Hours of Television Viewing

  Percent of students
6 or more
 hours per day 
 4 to 5 hours 
per day
 2 to 3 hours 
per day
 1 hour or 
 less per day 
 Home school  0.1% 1.6% 33.1% 65.3%
Nationwide 19.0% 19.5% 36.4% 25.1%

National data: NAEP Math 1997 

 

Computer Use

The Condition of Education provides a tabulation of the percent of students nationwide who report using a computer by frequency of use for 4th, 8th, and 11th graders in 1996. At each grade level, the distribution of computer use in 1998 by home school students is different from that of the nation in 1996. At each of these three grade levels, much larger percentages of home school students never use a computer. At the fourth-grade level, a much larger percent of home school students use a computer every day.

Table 2.11
Computer Use among Home School Students
and Students Nationwide in Grades 4, 8, and 11, in Percent

  Grade 4 Grade 8 Grade 11
Home
 school 
 Nationwide  Home
 school 
 Nationwide  Home
 school 
  Nationwide 
Never 28.2% 11.4% 37.1% 23.3% 40.5% 16.0%
Less than
 once a week 
29.4% 16.3% 28.9% 29.2% 28.9% 34.2%
Several
times a week
21.6% 62.5% 18.0% 30.7% 17.5% 31.8%
 Every day  20.8% 9.9% 16.0% 16.7% 13.1% 18.1%

National Data: Snyder and Wirt, 1998, Indicator 3 

 

Money Spent on Educational Materials

The amount of money spent in 1997 on home school education for textbooks, lesson materials, tutoring and enrichment services, and testing ranged from less than $200 to more than $2000. As shown in Table 2.12, the median amount of money spent was about $400.

Table 2.12
Home School Students Classified by Money Spent
On Home School Education in 1997

Amount  Frequency   Percent 
< $200   3,718 17.9%
$200-399   7,035 33.8%
$400-599   4,467 21.5%
$600-799   1,962 9.4%
$800-999     985 4.7%
 $1,000-1,599    1,630 7.8%
$1,600-1,999     247 1.2%
> $2,000     411 2.0%
Missing     336 1.6%

Total:  

20,790 100.0%

 

Other Demographic Characteristics

Compared to the nation, a much larger percentage of home school mothers are stay-at-home mothers not participating in the labor force. Some 76.9% of home school mothers do not work for pay. About 86.3% that do work do so part time. Nationwide, in 1996, only 30% of married women with children under 18 did not participate in the labor force (US Dept of Census, 1997a, Table 632).

A very large percentage of home school parents are certified to teach. Some 19.7% of the home school mothers are certified teachers; 7.1% of fathers. Almost one out of every four home school students (23.6%) has at least one parent who is a certified teacher.

Only 7.7% of the respondents were enrolled in a full-service curriculum program, i.e., a program that serves students and their parents as a "one-stop" primary source for textbooks, materials, lesson plans, tests, counseling, evaluations, record keeping, and the like for the year's core required subjects such as language, social studies, mathematics, and science.

Academic Achievement

The complete batteries of The Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (ITBS) and the Tests of Achievement and Proficiency (TAP) were used to assess student achievement in basic skills. The ITBS was used for home school students in Grades K-8; the TAP for students in grades 9-12. Almost all students took Form L; a handful took parallel Form K.

Achievement test batteries like the ITBS and TAP are a collection of tests in several subject areas that have been standardized and normed. Norms for all tests within these test batteries are based on the same group of students at each grade level. Such norms allow students to be compared with other students and groups to be compared with other groups.

The primary purpose of the ITBS and TAP is to assess the academic achievement of students in public and private schools. Consequently, much of the test development effort is devoted to identifying the content to be covered by these batteries. Riverside Publishers follow a four step process: 1) content specifications, 2) editorial review, 3) pilot testing, and 4) national norms development and updating.

The first and most critical step is developing content specifications and writing test items. This step involves the experience, research, and expertise of a large number of professionals representing a wide variety of specialties in the education community. Specifications are developed which outline the grade placement and emphasis of skills. These specifications draw heavily on an analysis of textbooks, research studies, nationally developed subject matter standards, and national curriculum committees.

Once the items have been developed and pilot tested, the final forms of the tests are developed and administered to large standardization samples to gather normative data and to develop scales.

The spring standardization sample for the 10 levels of the ITBS consisted of approximately 137,000 students from public schools, Catholic schools and private non-Catholic schools. The public school sample was stratified to assure adequate representation based on geographic region, district enrollment, socioeconomic status of the district. The Catholic school sample was stratified on geographic region and diocese enrollment. The non-Catholic private school sample was stratified on region and school type. The spring standardization sample for the four levels of the TAP consisted of approximately 20,000 students stratified on the same variables. National norms were developed based on the combined weighted distributions of all three school types: public, Catholic and non-Catholic private. Catholic/private school norms were developed based on the combined weighted distributions of the latter two groups. For simplicity, the combined public, Catholic and non-Catholic private school norms are referenced in this report as national norms or public/private school norms.

The data from the standardization sample are used to develop a variety of reporting scales, such as percentiles and grade equivalent scores. The analyses in this report rely primarily on the Developmental Standard Score (DSS) scale developed by Riverside Publishers. The DSS is a number that describes a student's location on an achievement continuum that spans grades K through 12. Table 3.1 shows the median DSS and median age that corresponds to each grade level in the national standardization sample. The DSS scale shows that the average annual growth in DSS units decreases each year.

Table 3.1
Median Developmental Scaled Scores and Median Age
for the ITBS/TAP Spring National Standardization Sample

  Grade
K 1 2 3 4 5